王毅：中国维护南海和平稳定决心不可动摇br 诚意始终如一
 |
??? ????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ?????????????? ??????????? ?? ????? ?????????? ????????????? ?? ???, ?? ????????? ???????????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ??????? ????? ???????????? ??? ????? ?????????? ???? ?? ???? ????? ????????????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ??????????? ??? ?? ??????? ????? ???????? ????? ?????? ???????? ?????? ????????? ?????. ??? ????? ????? ??? ?????????? ???????????? ??????? ???? ??? ?????????? ?????? ???? ????? ??????. |
 | ??? ????? ?????????????: ?????????? ????? ????? ???????????? ?????? ?????? ???? ??????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ???? ????????? ???? ??????? ??? ?????????????. ??? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?? ????????? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ??? ????????? ?????? ???????? ???? ????? ??????????? ??????????? ??? ???? ????????? ??????????? ????. |
| ???????? ?????? |
|---|
| ??????? ??????????? |
|
?????????? |
???????? ?????? ????????????? ??????? ?????????? ??????????, ????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ("??????") ?????? ???? ???????? ????? ?????? ???? ??????????????? ??? ?? ??? ?????????? ??????????? ????. ???????? ???, ???? ????????, ???????? ?? ?????????????, ??????????? ????? ???? ??????, ???? ?????? ?????? ?? ????????, ?? ??????? ????????????? ????? ????? ????????????? ???? ?? ???. ???????????? ??? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ???? ??????????:??????????/?????? ?????.
?????????? ??? ?????? ?????? ???? ??? ?????? ????? ????????????? ??? ???????????? ??? ????; ????? ?????????? ??????? ???? ???????????? ??? ??????? ??????. ??? ???? ????? ??? ????? ??? ?????? ??????? ??????? ?????? ????. ??? ???? ? ???????????? ?? ??????? ?????????? ?????????? ?? ?????? ???? ??????? ??? ????? ???? ?? ??? ??? ?????? ?????? ????????? ??????? ??????? ??? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ?? ???? ????.
??????? 4 ???? ?? ???, ????? ???????????? ?????????? 3 ?????? ??????.
???????????? ??? ???? ???????? ???????? ??? ?? ???? ????? ??? ??????? ???????. ??? ???????? ?????? ?????????? ???? ??????? ????????????, ??????? ?? ????????? ??????? ??? ??? ???. ?????????????, ??? ????? ?????? ?????? ???????????? ? ???? ?? ???. ??? ????? ????? ???? ?? ??????? ?????????? ?????????????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ?? ?????.
- See also: Bureaucrat logs - User rights, User rename
???????
In the very early days of Wikipedia, all users functioned as administrators to perform various administrative functions, using a single password that was handed out fairly freely.[1] The modern form of administratorship that editors know today was the result of a code modification, which changed from password access to role-based access control, under which individual accounts could be flagged as per the roles they could use, which in turn determined functions/tools they could access.
At that era of transition, it was pointed out that administrators should never develop into a special subgroup of the community but should be a part of the community like anyone else. Generally, most maintenance and administration aspects of Wikipedia can be conducted by anyone, without the specific technical functions granted to administrators. An often paraphrased comment about the title and process of administratorship was made by Jimmy Wales in February 2003—referred to as "sysops" here:
| “ | I just wanted to say that becoming a sysop is *not a big deal*. I think perhaps I'll go through semi-willy-nilly and make a bunch of people who have been around for awhile sysops. I want to dispel the aura of "authority" around the position. It's merely a technical matter that the powers given to sysops are not given out to everyone. I don't like that there's the apparent feeling here that being granted sysop status is a really special thing. |
” |
| —?Jimmy Wales, wikimedia.org archive entry | ||
???? ?????? ???? ???? ??:
| “ | ?? ?????? ??? ??? ??????????? ??? ?? ?? ????? ??????. |
” |
A modern clarification of this statement would be that while the correct use of the tools and appropriate conduct is considered important, merely "being an administrator" is not.
???????????? ????? ?????
- Note: Each individual Wikimedia project (including other Wikipedias) may have its own policy for granting adminship.
The English Wikipedia has no official requirements you must meet to become a Wikipedia administrator. Anyone can apply regardless of their Wikipedia experience. Administrators are expected to uphold the trust and confidence of the community, however, and considerable experience is usually expected. Each editor will personally assess their confidence in a particular candidate's readiness in their own way. Before requesting or accepting a nomination, candidates should generally be active and regular Wikipedia contributors for at least several months, be familiar with the procedures and practices of Wikipedia, respect and understand its policies, and have gained the general trust of the community.
If at this point you are interested in requesting adminship, you should first read the guide to requests for adminship and the nomination instructions. When you are ready to apply, you may add your nomination to the ??????????:Requests for adminship ("RFA") page, according to the aforementioned instructions. A discussion (not a vote) will then take place among fellow editors about whether you should become an administrator. After seven days, a bureaucrat will determine if there is consensus to approve your request. This is sometimes difficult to ascertain, and is not a numerical measurement, but as a general descriptive rule of thumb most of those above ~80% approval pass and most of those below ~70% fail.
Only one account of a given person may have administrative tools. See WP:ADMINSOCK.
Adminship is granted indefinitely, and is only removed upon request or under circumstances involving high-level intervention (see administrator abuse below).
?????????????? ???????? ??????
?????????? ?????? ????????
?? ??? ????????????? ??? ?????? ?????? ????? ??????? ??? ?? ??? ?????? ?? ?????? ??? ????????????? ??? ??????? ?? ??????.?????????? ???? ???????? ?? IP ????? ????? ?????? ??????? ?????? ????????? ?????????? ??? ??????.??? ??????? ????? ???????? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ????; ?? ??????? ??????? ??? ??? ???? ??? ?????? ?????? ???????? ???? ????????? ???? ????? ??? ???? ???? ??? ???? ????.????? ?????????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??? ????? ?????? ???? ?????? ?????? ?? ????? ??? ?????????? ?????? ??????? ??? ????? ?? ??? ?????. ?? ?????????? ?????? ????? ?? ?? ????????? ????????? ?????? ?? ???? ??? ??????? ????.????????? ?????????? ????????????? ????????? ?????? ????? ?????. ???????????? ?? ??????? ???? ??????? ?????? ?????? ???? ???? ??????? ????? ?????? ???? ??? ?????????? ??????? ???????? ?????????? ??? ?????.
??????? ???????
???????????? ??????? ??????????????? ??? ??????? ???????? ????? ??? ??? ??? ?? ??? ?????? ????? ????? ????? ???????? ???????? ??????? ?????? ?? ?????.???? ???? ??? ???????? ??? ?????????? ?????? ???????? ?????????????? ???? ?????? ????? ?? ?????. ?????? ???? ???????? ???? ?? ???????? ???? ?????? ??????? ??????. ???? ??? ?? ??? ?????????? ?? ???? ????????? ??? ?????.? ??? ?????, ?????? ??????????? ?????? ???? ????????????? ??????????,??????????? ?? ?????? ????????? ??????? ??????? ??? ???????? ?????? ????? ?? ???? ??????????? ???? ?????? ???? ??? ???. ???????????? ??????? ????? ???????????? ????????????? ?? ??????????? ???????? ??? ????????? ???????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ????? ????? ?????. ???????????? ?? ???? ??????????????? ??? ????? ??? ?? ???? ???? ????? ???????. ???????, ??? ????????????? ??? ?? ?? ??? ????????? ??????? ??? ???????? ??? ?????? ??????????? ??????????? ??? ?????? ??????? ?????? ?? ???? ?? ??? ?? ??????????? ?????? ????? ??????????????? ?????? ? ???? ?????? ?????.
?????
???????????? ?????? ????? ?? ??????
Administrator rights can be particularly helpful for working in certain areas of Wikipedia.
See also ??????????:Admins willing to make difficult blocks, where admins willing to handle more difficult blocks and other situations can make themselves known, and the administrators channel on IRC for IRC users.
"Uninvolved administrators" can also help in the management of Arbitration Committee remedies and the dispute resolution concerning chronic disruptive areas and situations. Administrators acting in this role are neutral; they do not have any direct involvement in the issues they are helping people with. Lists can be found at ??????????:General sanctions and Arbitration enforcement requests and the related Arbitration enforcement noticeboard (WP:AE).
??????? ??? ?????????
- ?????????? ????????? ???? ??????? ????????? ?????? ?????.
- ?????????????? ??????????????? ???????? ?????.
- ????? ??????? ???????? ??stewards ?????????? ?????? ?? ?????
| ??????? ???? | ??? ?? ???? | ??????? ??? ????????? ???? | ????? | ??????/????? ??????? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lee | 2006 ???? 1 | ??? 19???? ??? ???? ???? ??? 3 | ??????????? | si-N, en-3 |
| Singhalawap | 2011 ?????????? 03 | ??? 13???? ??? 10???? ??? ??? | ??????????? | si-N, en-3 |
| ??????? ???? | ??? ?? ???? | ??????? ??? ????????? ???? | ????? | ??????/????? ??????? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chin | 2005 ?????????? 1 | ??? 1756 ?? | ??????????? ????? | |
| Kylu | 2007 ??????? 18 | ??? 867 ?? | ??????????? ????? | |
| Lahiru_k | 2007 ?????????? 20 | ??? 1015 ?? | ??????????? ????? | |
| Snowolfd4 | 2007 ????????? 16 | ??? 988 ?? | ??????????? ????? | |
| ?????? | 2010 ???? 10 | ??? 686 ?? | ??????????? ????? | |
| Asiri wiki | 2009 ???? 30 | ??? 2050 ?? | ??????????? ????? | si-N, en-3 |
??????? ??????? ???? ?? ????? ????? ?? ??????? ?????
 ????????? ???? |
|---|
- ?? ?????? ???? ??????????:??????????? ?????????? ?????? ?????.
????? ???????
- ????? ????? ???? ??????? ????????? ?????.
??? ????? ?? ??????? ???? ???? ???????
This section is for requesting bureaucrat, oversight, checkuser, and other miscellaneous permissions. Bot permissions should be requested at ??????????:Bots
Please note that by Foundation policy, users receiving checkuser and oversight permission must submit proof of identification to the Wikimedia Foundation office and be 18 years of age or older.
At this time, these functions can be handled by the Wikimedia Stewards for this wiki. Stewards are encouraged to handle any requests requiring bureaucrat, checkuser, oversight, or other functions as they see fit. If you keep checkuser access, please ensure that at least two users have checkuser at any given time.
?????????????? ???????? ??????
??? ????????????? ?????? ???? ???????? ????????. ???? ??????????? ???? ?????? ????? ?????.
???? ?????? ?? ????? ???? ???? ???????? ?? ????? ?? ??????
Requests for deletion should be made by placing the {{delete}} tag on the page in question along with a reason.
All sysops should watch ??????????:Requests for issues that sysops must be aware of, and for news about policy changes affecting sysops.
?????? ?????
????? ????
|
|
|